Skip to main content

REVOCATION OF A DECISION MUST REMAIN THE EXCEPTION AND NOT BECOME THE RULE

REVOCATION OF A DECISION MUST REMAIN THE EXCEPTION AND NOT BECOME THE RULE

The tenant claims the revocation of the decision rendered on 31 October 2013 which terminates the lease and sentenced him to pay the sum of $9,625.00 for unpaid rent.
The tenant alleged in his claim that he is able to produce new evidence to justify a partial or total reduction of rent. The document in question is a report on the presence of mold in the house. The report is dated October 31, and the analysis has been done on 28 October 2013.

This article is locked and is accessible only to Silver, Gold or Platinum members.

Please Loginor Register.

About the author

Me Robert Soucy, avocat

Me Robert Soucy, auparavant régisseur devant la Régie du Logement du Québec, membre du Barreau du Québec depuis 1979, oeuvre auprès des propriétaires depuis 1984.

Il a donné de nombreuses conférences autant pour le Barreau du Québec que les membres de l'Association des propriétaires du Québec. Ainsi qu'écrit des articles dans le mensuel "Le Propriétaire".

Avocat connu et reconnu, il représente les propriétaires de logements locatifs devant la Régie du logement et devant diverses médias.

Join now

Not already member of the APQ ?

Take advantage of all our services by joining now

This site uses cookies in order to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to the use of cookies.