Skip to main content

A clause prohibiting animals is ruled to be neither abusive, nor unreasonable according to the Court.

A clause prohibiting animals is ruled to be  neither abusive, nor unreasonable according to the Court.

In the case of Bertrand v. Gratton and the Office municipale d’habitation de Laval1, the landlord petitioned for the cancellation of the lease and the eviction of the tenant who owned a dog in violation of the terms of the lease. As an alternate conclusion, ...

This article is locked and is accessible only to Silver, Gold or Platinum members.

Please Loginor Register.

About the author

Me Bill Kostopoulos

Join now

Not already member of the APQ ?

Take advantage of all our services by joining now

This site uses cookies in order to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing to browse this site, you agree to the use of cookies.